a0o Asp searchoraping%20japanese%20chicky Asp o Asp k Shavingcutebaresexslaves rsearchFo Asp 0 Shavingcutebaresexslaves 2 Faq C Faq masearchg Siste Cunt a Siste n Asp & Shavingcutebaresexslaves Fsearchn Faq njapanese%20horny%20girl%20on%20the%20busisearchl Cunt Isearchd Faq ssearchr Cunt awwe%E3%80%81456fff%E3%80%81come Asp O Cunt e Cunt Cunt 5 Cunt 5 Asp 0 Faq 0searchT Cunt Asp e Cunt ak a0o Asp searchoraping%20japanese%20chicky Asp o Asp k Shavingcutebaresexslaves rsearchFo Asp 0 Shavingcutebaresexslaves 2 Faq C Faq masearchg Siste
[bold]Before You Embark On A Journey Of Revenge, Dig Two Graves.[/bold] Original thread at link
DC Comics AND Marvel Superheroes Come Out of the Closet May 24, 2012 Part 1: DC Comics recently announced one of their most popular, but as of yet unnamed, prominent characters will soon be coming out of the closet. DC Comics, owned by Warner Bros. Entertainment Company, has decided that one of their beloved superheroes will be homosexual. Who will they choose; Batman, Superman, Flash, Green Lantern, Plastic Man, or another one of their characters that children look up to? Last year, DC Comics Co-publisher Dan DiDio said that the company would not change the sexual orientation of an existing superhero and would bring in a new one altogether. Parents may have been able to avoid a new character since it would not be one many children have grown to admire. DiDio has changed his mind and will not be introducing a brand new character. They will feature an existing character who was previously assumed to be straight, will now become openly gay. Senior VP Sales Bob Wayne said DiDio's view 'had evolved', comparing the shift to Barack Obama's recent endorsement of same-sex marriage, according to a report. DiDio did not specify which character would 'come out' or in which issue it would be featured. It will likely be a June issue during LBGT month, joining lesbian character Batwoman. Part 2: And to make matters more shocking, Marvel, now owned by Disney, followed DC Comics' announcement with a surprise of their own. Northstar, Marvel's first openly gay hero, is going to tie the knot with his boyfriend in the current issue of "Astonishing X-Men." This is the first same-sex wedding in a superhero comic book. In "Astonishing X-Men" #50, which hit comic shop shelves Wednesday, Northstar proposes to his boyfriend, Kyle, a fellow snow sports enthusiast who possesses no superpowers. The couple will seal the deal in issue #51, slated for a June 20 release. "The story of Northstar and Kyle is universal, and at the core of everything I write: a powerful love between two people who have to fight for it against all odds," said X-Men comic writer Marjorie Liu in a statement. Children desire to be just like superheroes. Children mimic superhero actions and even dress up in costumes to resemble these characters as much as possible. Can you imagine little boys saying, "I want a boyfriend or husband like X-Men?" This is ridiculous! Why do adult gay men need comic superheroes as role models? They don't but do want to indoctrate impressionable young minds by placing these gay characters on pedestals in a positive light. These companies are heavily influencing our youth by using children's superheroes to desensitize and brainwash them in thinking that a gay lifestyle choice is normal and desirable. As Christians, we know that homosexuality is a sin (Romans 1:26-27). Unfortunately, children are now being exposed to homosexuality at an early age. Comic books would be one of the last places a parent would expect their child to be confronted with homosexual topics that are too complicated for them to understand. Children do not know what straight, homosexual, or coming out of the closet even means, but DC Comics and Marvel are using superheroes to confuse them on this topic to raise questions and awareness of an alternative lifestyle choice. These companies are prompting a premature discussion on sexual orientation. Northstar's wedding will be the first same-sex wedding in the world of mainstream superhero comics, but not the first gay comic books character. Earlier this year One Million Moms emailed Toys 'R' Us concerning the "Life With Archie" No. 16 with two gay characters getting hitched. Toys 'R' Us had the audacity to display "Archie- Just Married" at the front of the store by the checkout counters. TAKE ACTION Please send DC Comics (Warner Bros. Entertainment Company) and Marvel (Disney) an email urging them to change and cancel all plans of homosexual superhero characters immediately. Ask them to do the right thing and reverse their decision to have sexual orientation displayed to readers. Send Your Letter Now! Sincerely, Monica Cole, Director
they%20don%27t%20realize%20that%20these%20comics%20are%20not%20read%20by%20child
I'll be happy to help them pack their bags.
They Need to Go Away
"I don't know whether Barack Obama was born in the United States of America. I don't know that. But I do know this, that in his heart, he's not an American. He's just not an American." Coffman apologized on Wednesday night, completely walking back from his original statement about Obama's citizenship. "I misspoke and I apologize," Coffman said about the comments in Elbert County in a written statement. "I have confidence in President Obama’s citizenship and legitimacy as President of the United States."
Rep. Mike Coffman, Colorado Republican Congressman, Says Obama Is 'Not An American'
But Jon Cryer disagrees vehemently: "I want to stand up for all the slightly [childish epithet posted by a bigoted tool] dorks that are actually heterosexual. Just cause the gaydar is going off, doesn't mean your instruments aren't faulty. I've had to live with that, and that's okay."
Is there anyone left we want to win?
Continuing in the glow of Glee.\ \ Madonna songs I Love:\ Express Yourself\ Like a Prayer\ You Must Love Me\ \ Madonna songs I hate:\ Frozen\ Rain\ Dance Tonite
Luke has signed on play the villain in "Fast & Furious 6".
If all 9/11 threads end up deleted within a day or two, then presumably it is against the rules of this website for us to discuss that subject? Why is that? Shouldn't it be expressly stated somewhere that certain topics are banned from discussion?
I didn't know about most of these. More details at link. List of the feuds: Kevin Smith vs. Bruce Willis Stanley Kubrick vs. Scatman Crothers/Stanley Kubrick vs. Shelley Duvall David O. Russell vs. George Clooney/David O. Russell vs. Lily Tomlin Otto Preminger vs. Faye Dunaway/Roman Polanski vs. Faye Dunaway Michael Bay vs. Megan Fox Tony Kaye vs. Edward Norton Lars von Trier vs. Björk Alfred Hitchcock vs. Tippi Hedren Henri-Georges Clouzot vs. Brigitte Bardot Sidney Pollack vs. Dustin Hoffman
Just curious, as a news junkie, if anyone is actually paying for access to the New York Times online, or other papers? Is it worth it, do you think? Just curious what people are thinking on this topic.
I know it sounds odd, but I kind of miss that sound that connected you to the Internet and then the booming, "You've got mail!". Listen to the sound at the link and share your memories..
All these talking heads on TV continue to try to make this coming election a race is disgusting. If Obama loses, it will be time enough to worry about the future. Any sane person who works couldn't possibly vote Romeany unless they have a problem with skin color. I know keeping the public interested in watching TV is a means of selling advertising and paying talking heads too much money, but the public may become wise to this schtick and tune them out.
Did any of you frequent these rooms on AOL?
If you have...please describe her.
He wants to meet for drinks tonight and chat. We stopped hooking up when he found his "true love". Now he shows back up a year later. What do you think he's up to? I checked his Facebook status and he's still in a relationship.
In an interview with Time magazine, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney pledged six percent unemployment by the end of his first term in office. “I can tell you that over a period of four years, by virtue of the policies that we’d put in place, we’d get the unemployment rate down to 6 percent, and perhaps a little lower,” he told Mark Halperin. Unemployment currently stands at 8.1 percent. Romney first pledged 5.9 percent unemployment when he released his economic plan in September of 2011, but he has not repeated the number since. The candidate said earlier this month, when April job numbers were released, that “anything near 8 percent or over 4 percent is not cause for celebration.” Setting a high-profile, specific goal could be risky for Romney should he win this fall. But during the campaign, it’s a specific, ambitious marker he can use to highlight what he believes to be the failed economic policies of the current president. And current CBO and OMB projections suggest unemployment will fall to about 6 percent in 2016. Romney and other Republicans have repeatedly claimed that Obama promised the stimulus would keep unemployment below 8 percent. That number was a projection from Obama’s economic advisers outlining various stimulus scenarios, written before the president took office. Should he win, Romney said he hopes to start working on the economy right away. “My preference would be to have the opportunity to do that after the election as opposed to have the President in a lame-duck session try and create a solution that may not be in keeping with the new administration,” he said. Asked if he welcomed scrutiny of his record at the private equity firm Bain Capital, Romney replied that he would focus on Obama’s record. “[T]he American people are interested in, not so much in the history of where I was at Bain Capital, or that I have understanding of the private sector, but instead, has the President made things better for the American people?” he said. But, Romney added, “having been in the private sector for twenty five years gives me a perspective on how jobs are created.”